Canche logo elcanche - words & images from Guatemala
Journal

May 26, 2005

Human Rights: USA & Guatemala

Amnesty International has just published it's International Report 2005, which takes an unblinking look at human rights violations around the world. The report, which covers 149 countries, came to this general conclusion:

During 2004, the human rights of ordinary men, women and children were disregarded or grossly abused in every corner of the globe. Economic interests, political hypocrisy and socially orchestrated discrimination continued to fan the flames of conflict around the world. The “war on terror” appeared more effective in eroding international human rights principles than in countering international “terrorism”. The millions of women who suffered gender-based violence in the home, in the community or in war zones were largely ignored. The economic, social and cultural rights of marginalized communities were almost entirely neglected.

Irene Khan, Secretary General of A.I. had some particularly scathing words for the United States in the Report's Foreword:

The USA, as the unrivalled political, military and economic hyper-power, sets the tone for governmental behavior worldwide. When the most powerful country in the world thumbs its nose at the rule of law and human rights, it grants a license to others to commit abuse with impunity and audacity. From Israel to Uzbekistan, Egypt to Nepal, governments have openly defied human rights and international humanitarian law in the name of national security and “counter-terrorism”.

The Guatemala section of the Report opened with this discouraging summary:

Forced violent evictions in rural areas increased sharply. Human rights defenders continued to suffer intimidation and persecution. Violence against women, in particular murders, increased. Impunity remained endemic, including for past human rights violations.

It also quoted a United Nations publication about Guatemala:

MINUGUA’s final report concluded that, despite advances in the political sphere, fundamental reforms envisaged in the 1996 Peace Accords had not been implemented. It noted the persistence of problems of severe racism and vast social inequality. It warned that if left unchecked, the problems could lead to social conflict, stunted economic development and the corrosion of democratic government.

The situation facing women in Guatemala was particularly brutal:

The national police recorded more than 527 women murdered in Guatemala, a significant increase from 2003. Many of those killed, mainly from the poorer sectors of society, were raped prior to death. Some were also mutilated. The UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women found that the Guatemalan government was failing in its international obligations to effectively prevent, investigate and prosecute violence against women.

The Guatemalan section ends with a poignant paragraph on threats and intimidation:

Human rights activists, witnesses and members of the judiciary involved in investigations of past human rights violations were subjected to persistent intimidation, death threats and attacks. Trade unionists and journalists were also targeted. Such attacks were frequently commissioned or perpetrated by quasi-official groups allegedly acting in collusion with members of the security forces.

Other resources:

U.S. 'Thumbs Its Nose' at Rights, Amnesty Says (NY Times)

Posted by elcanche at May 26, 2005 04:15 PM
Comments

The world has lost so much since 9/11/01. I think there have been opportunities to make things better, but they have not been taken. How sad...

Posted by: Carol at May 27, 2005 01:09 PM

¡¡¡527 women murdered in a year!!!
That's fricking... I think that all of us have to work hard to change things in Guatemala, it's sad to see how our government ignore this awfull things...

Posted by: Chicken at May 27, 2005 03:56 PM

A flurry of counterspin has come out from Conservatives over the US being listed by Amnesty. The same conservatives who talk endlessly about Amnesty validating Saddam Hussein's villany are now callign the organization lightweight, unreliable, hysterical. Amnesty's director made a great defense against this yesterday on Brian Lehrer (WNYC-FM)

Posted by: Evan at June 2, 2005 05:29 AM

Evan,

You're absolutely right.

Here's a summary from the Thinkprogress.org website:

In the past, when it was convenient to the Administration, they did not hesitate to cite Amnesty to make its case. And nowhere did the Administration need more help than in selling the Iraq war.

Secretary Rumsfeld repeatedly turned to Amnesty to highlight the repressive nature of Saddam’s regime.

On March 27, 2003, Rumsfeld said:
We know that it’s a repressive regime…Anyone who has read Amnesty International or any of the human rights organizations about how the regime of Saddam Hussein treats his people…

The next day, Rumsfeld even cited his "careful reading" of Amnesty:

…[I]t seems to me a careful reading of Amnesty International or the record of Saddam Hussein, having used chemical weapons on his own people as well as his neighbors, and the viciousness of that regime, which is well known and documented by human rights organizations, ought not to be surprised.

And on April 1, 2003, Rumsfeld said once again:
[I]f you read the various human rights groups and Amnesty International’s description of what they know has gone on, it’s not a happy picture.

So the rule here appears to be: Amnesty is a legitimate source for human rights violations of other countries, but is an unreliable and irresponsible source for reporting on the U.S.

Posted by: Rob at June 3, 2005 03:01 PM
Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?
Blogalaxia
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
rob@elcanche.com ©2006 text & images